Large cardinals and resurrection axioms

نویسندگان

  • Konstantinos Tsaprounis
  • Jouko Väänänen
چکیده

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Resurrection axioms and uplifting cardinals

We introduce the resurrection axioms, a new class of forcing axioms, and the uplifting cardinals, a new large cardinal notion, and prove that various instances of the resurrection axioms are equiconsistent over ZFC with the existence of an uplifting car-

متن کامل

Notes to “The Resurrection Axioms”

I will discuss a new class of forcing axioms, the Resurrection Axioms (RA), and the Weak Resurrection Axioms (wRA). While Cohen’s method of forcing has been designed to change truths about the set-theoretic universe you live in, the point of Resurrection is that some truths that have been changed by forcing can in fact be resurrected, i.e. forced to hold again. In this talk, I will illustrate h...

متن کامل

Ramsey-like cardinals

One of the numerous characterizations of a Ramsey cardinal κ involves the existence of certain types of elementary embeddings for transitive sets of size κ satisfying a large fragment of ZFC. I introduce new large cardinal axioms generalizing the Ramsey elementary embeddings characterization and show that they form a natural hierarchy between weakly compact cardinals and measurable cardinals. T...

متن کامل

Violating the Singular Cardinals Hypothesis Without Large Cardinals

Easton proved that the behavior of the exponential function 2 at regular cardinals κ is independent of the axioms of set theory except for some simple classical laws. The Singular Cardinals Hypothesis SCH implies that the Generalized Continuum Hypothesis GCH 2 = κ holds at a singular cardinal κ if GCH holds below κ. Gitik and Mitchell have determined the consistency strength of the negation of ...

متن کامل

The Two-cardinals Transfer Property and Resurrection of Supercompactness

We show that the transfer property (א1,א0)→ (λ+, λ) for singular λ does not imply (even) the existence of a non-reflecting stationary subset of λ+. The result assumes the consistency of ZFC with the existence of infinitely many supercompact cardinals. We employ a technique of “resurrection of supercompactness”. Our forcing extension destroys the supercompactness of some cardinals; to show that ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2012